| Others |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Writing and Speaking > Writing > Print-On-Demand: A Definition and a Comparison |
|
Others - Print-On-Demand: A Definition and a Comparison
The purpose of this article is to consider Print-On-Demand
publishing as an alternative for the aspiring author. It has its
strengths and its weaknesses. You may wonder as you begin reading
this, but in the end I'm going to say some good things about it. The title explains the technology. The way that literature has traditionally been printed involves running many copies simul- taneously in order to bring the price per copy down. Smaller print runs, such as advertising, brochures, or concert pro According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product grams,
cost more per copy because they are small print runs. Until
recently, printing a single book was all but unthinkable. In the case of novels, the traditional print publisher begins by printing several thousand copies. His goal is to run off the smallest number of copies he can while getting the best possible price per copy. These books are then sent to bookstores, which tend to prefer something along the lines of what has succeeded before. The remainder sits in a warehouse somewhere. Per ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in haps to be shipped as
the orders come in, perhaps to be joined by any "remaindered"
copies the bookstores couldn't move. This represents an investment on the part of that publisher, hence his paranoia about experimenting with new formats or (more importantly) new authors. Print-On-Demand (POD) uses a completely different process. The end result is, the price per copy on a small run is much lower. How small of a run? Try one book. Zero inventory. The book is economically produced when the reade lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. r orders it, not before. This technology was probably invented for sales literature. Then someone realized it might be a pretty cool way to get ARCs (Advance Review Copies) out to the book reviewers before the book was actually available. Finally, someone decided to get it into the publishing mainstream. Why is it so much cheaper to publish a single book via POD? The reasons really aren't relevant to this article, besides which they'd probably bore you. But if you care, the first link below sp here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe lls it all out. http://www.jdwrite.com/writing/pod_01.htm http://www.jdwrite.com/writing/pod_02.htm http://www.jdwrite.com/writing/pod_03.htm http://www.jdwrite.com/writing/pod_04.htm http://www.jdwrite.com/writing/pod_05.htm I recommend reading (or at least skimming) all five of those, by the way. It's quite a comprehensive analysis of how. Then come back to this article to determine why. Or if. Have you ever heard of the author who self-published and wound up with a best-sel d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro ler? They do exist! Now look at all the self-published authors who couldn't do that. They're the vast majority. The author who uses POD faces similar longshot odds. POD has a definite advantage over other self-publishing, in that you don't wind up with a few hundred (or more?) copies of a book in your basement because you can't sell them. Thus, it's cheaper, with no difference in quality unless you hook up with losers. But neither option will bring you the readership that you'll get from a suc ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc cessful book with a traditional print publisher. I have self published. I went to a local print shop back in the pre-POD days, ran off 80 copies at $3 a copy, and sold them to local bookstores for $6 a copy. Lots of fun, and lots of learning, but I didn't get rich. My wage per hour stunk, but that was fine with me because I honestly didn't care. I broke even and gave away the rest. A pleasant way to spend lunch hours during the work week. Most of us, though, just don't have that kind of time. A easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi nd even
if we do, why bother? Take the money you'd have invested and buy
some Microsoft stock, then take the time you'd have invested and
write more books. You'll be happier and you'll make more money. Having said all that, why am I recommending POD at all? In my case, it's because I've written some books that no print publisher will ever pick up. That's my honest appraisal. If I were a mercenary type, I'd follow that up with something like "Why'd you even write those books then?" But if you're nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically a
REAL writer, you know the answer. It's always about writing first, marketing second. Two different hats. I'm assuming you already did the writing and now are wondering what the heck to do with it. As an example, my EPPIE 2002 finalist is too short. I wrote it back when print publishers wanted 40,000 words. Now they want 50,000. But it doesn't take 50,000 words to tell that particular story, and I'm not padding it. Even if I were willing, it'd stink and nobody would buy it. Give the publisher and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ s some credit. They
know padding when they see it. The same goes for the readers. As another example, consider my short story collection. Critically acclaimed and selling moderately well, but no traditional publisher wants short story collections from unknown authors. It's just that simple. So, I simultaneously published these books in e-book format and POD format. E-books are cheaper and more environmentally friendly, but the paperback option is still there for those who can't or won't ever r ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi ead an e-book. (Daddy is in that group, by the way. How about your family?) Places who publish only POD began by accepting anything sent their way. Pay your money, and do your own editing and marketing. This gave POD a credibility problem. There are POD outfits who don't operate this way, but the credibility problem will take time to heal. As an author, your goal is to write what's in your heart, find people who like to read what you like to write, and get it out to them. (That's my goal, anyw ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a ay.) If your name happens to be Tom
Clancy, that equals many readers. But that's simply luck of the
draw. Many of us don't have such mass appeal. Possibly you're the sort of writer who knows exactly where you stand in that respect. But many don't, and they're flooding the POD market with stuff that most readers just plain don't want. Add to that the badly edited stuff, and the credibility problem with POD is understandable. Ideally, what you want is for your e-publisher to simultaneously relea dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod e your book in both formats without charging a POD setup
fee. That way, you can direct all your promotional efforts to
that single URL. However, these e-publishers have a real problem
with backlog now, so if you want to travel the road I did, you'll
need much more patience than I did. Taking advantage of a free POD option with your e-book will also help your promotional efforts. Many reviewers just plain won't touch an e-book. If you've done the POD bit, in addition to being able to tell all yo cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin ur friends and family, "Look at this, I'm a
real author because here's the paperback," you'll be able to send
review copies via POD to those book reviewers. If you find yourself with an e-publisher who doesn't offer free POD, you may wish to shop around for a POD publisher. As you do this, remember the business model. If a publisher makes all its money from writers, it doesn't need to sell a single book to a single reader to stay in business. No matter how much praise they send your way, that's tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen the bottom
line. Writing is a calling, but publishing is a business. Those
authors who can't distinguish between the two are what keep the
opportunists in business. I was such an author for most of my
life. Some POD places are no more than thinly veiled vanity (or subsidy) presses. They have a role to serve, but let's be honest. Most do no editing, and they don't care. They may not be making a massive profit from your setup fees, but they're making enough to stay in business. Even if you don' t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel t sell any books to
anyone except your Gramma. Earlier, I recommended e-publishing before print publishing for the free editing you'll receive. If you're going with POD, consider it mandatory. Either that, or pay an editor. The author who can write a mistake-free manuscript does not exist. Still interested in POD publishing? Here are the questions you should ask yourself when you select a POD publisher: A) Sale price of each book 1) Who decides what it is? 2) Will readers pay that much? B) P ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust ofit per sale vs. your setup cost 1) How many copies must you sell to break even? 2) Can you do it? 3) If not, do you care? How big of a financial hit are you willing to take just to see your name in print? As a rule, US$100 or less setup cost is good and US$1000 is very bad. The latter, no matter how much publicity they promise you, is only a thinly disguised vanity publisher. You won't sell enough books to recoup that $1000 unless you're a real marketing machine. Even then you shouldn't pay y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products the $1000. It won't get you anything
that $100 won't. If the POD place only prints "trade paperbacks," which are the larger ones, your cost per book (and sale price per book) will be higher than if you can print "mass-market paperbacks." The choice is yours, but whatever you decide, visit the local bookstores and price similar-sized books. If you write like Stephen King but charge twice as much per book, readers are going to buy the author they've heard of, and that's probably not you. Yet... . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de A comprehensive list of POD publishers, along with descriptions,
can be found on-line at http://dehanna.com/database.htm It fails to mention Booksurge (http://www.booksurge.com), also known as Digitz (http://www.digitz.net). US$99. I have no experience with them, but I've heard only good things about them. Another that isn't mentioned is Digital Print Australia at http://www.digitalprintaustralia.com. I've used them. My setup cost was AUD$35 (roughly US$18 back then), which compares rather favo elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip rably to those listed. Their price per copy is also excellent. The quality equals what you'll find in the bookstores. If you've ever bought a paperback from Writers Exchange, you've seen it. If not, Digital Print will send you a free sample. They sent mine to China. Two problems you may have with them, though, are shipping charges from Australia if that's not where your readers are located, and the fact that they don't offer a way to sell the books on their site. Copyright 2005, Michael LaRocc tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Relationship Marketing and Your Computer Consulting Business Leverage Your Time & Talent to Help More People & Make More Money Mobile Auto Detailers; Developing a Web Presence
|